![]() |
Breaking News |
|
04/2002
05/2002
06/2002
07/2002
08/2002
09/2002
10/2002
11/2002
02/2003
03/2003
04/2003
05/2003
06/2003
07/2003
08/2003
09/2003
10/2003
02/2004
03/2004
05/2004
06/2004
07/2004
08/2004
09/2004
11/2004
12/2004
01/2005
03/2005
04/2005
06/2005
07/2005
03/2006
04/2006
06/2006
07/2006
08/2006
09/2006
10/2006
11/2006
12/2006
02/2007
03/2007
04/2007
05/2007
06/2007
07/2007
08/2007
09/2007
10/2007
11/2007
12/2007
02/2008
03/2008
04/2008
05/2008
06/2008
08/2008
09/2008
10/2008
11/2008
12/2008
01/2009
02/2009
03/2009
04/2009
current
News by and for the members and friends of the North Shore Frogmen's Club
|
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Latest Patrick Tax Plan Takes Double Toll on Massachusetts Divers
Independent consultants who have reviewed Patrick’s proposed 19¢ per gallon gas tax increase have noted that the new levy is on all gasses, including oxygen and compressed air. Not yet resolved is an ambiguity in the law regarding whether the tax on air will be assessed at atmospheric or working pressure, which could result in an unpleasant surprise at the fill station for many local divers. The actual internal volume of a typical scuba cylinder is a mere four-tenths of a cubic foot, but it rises to 80 cubic feet at 3,000 pounds per square inch, the optimal pressure for a freshly filled tank according to a spokesman for the Dive Equipment Manufacturer’s Association. “Since there are roughly seven and one half gallons in a cubic foot,” according to Andover High School physics teacher and avid diver David Duncan, “how we measure the fill will have a huge impact on the expense.” Duncan ran a set of calculations for the Globe showing that at “sea level” as dive enthusiasts refer to “atmospheric pressure,” the tax on an oxygen “fill” would amount to approximately 57¢, but that at “working pressure” the fee skyrocketed to an astounding $113. Scratching his head, Duncan mused, “That can’t be right.” The Patrick administration was mum on how the law would be interpreted, but State House insiders hinted that some compromise between the high and low figures might be appropriate. Noting that Democrats were also discussing a so-called “sin tax” on beer and alcoholic beverages, one capitol hill lawmaker associated with the Massachusetts Lobsterman’s Association pointed out that “them divers get a buzz off all that nitrogen in their tanks, and they should pay for that too… and stop stealing our lobsters.” Captain Fred Calhoun, a noted scuba instructor, lecturer and author was emphatic: “All the more reason to dry fill your tank! Wet filling is dangerous and bad for your tank and now, it can even cost you extra tax money!” Local diver Rube Welkin was quick to differ, griping that it looked like the tax would be levied on a 3,000 pound fill, but “even though we paid for 3,000, when we get to the beach it’s a lousy 2,750. Typical!”
Comments:
I will not agree to a "sin tax" on an air fill unless ethanol is added to the gas mix. Why dive all the way to 80 or 100 feet to get narc'ed when ethanol in the gas mix can give a major buzz at 20 feet.
The "gas" tax should only apply to air in the liquid form. The density of air as a gas is 3.2 kg/m3 and as a liquid 875 kg/m3. As a liquid, 80 cu. ft of air would condense down to 2.2 gallons and a 120 cu. ft tank would condense to 3.3 gallons thus the cost would be$0.42 and $0.63 per fill, respectively.
Post a Comment
|